easyai.video
For science communication
Create compelling scientific video without a traditional animation-production budget.
AI generates the visuals. You control the science.
Your first 15–30 second sample is free. No credit card, subscription or call. Send one topic and we review it before anything is made.
Founder-reported figures from the original posts, not independently audited. Audience results depend on topic and distribution as much as on the video.
166K views · 115K unique viewers
Posted from an account about a week old, with roughly 10 followers.
Founder-led workflow; models were selected shot by shot.
Take-by-take changes, attempt count and production cost were not recorded.
137K views
Posted from an account about three weeks old, with 150+ followers.
Founder-led workflow; models were selected shot by shot.
Take-by-take changes, attempt count and production cost were not recorded.
A commissioned scientific animation is priced like a production, which puts it out of reach for most research communication.
Models, providers and prices move constantly. Learning one tool is not the same as having a workflow.
A model will happily produce a confident, wrong mechanism. Someone who knows the subject has to look at every take.
Sources in one place, references in another, generations in a third. Nothing remembers how a good shot was made.
You send the topic, script or paper, plus anything that must look right.
It becomes a shot plan: what each shot shows, and what it must not imply.
You see intermediate visuals and correct them before the next generation.
Corrected shots are assembled into the finished piece.
Corrections happen before more generation, not after the edit. That order is what keeps the science right and the cost down.
Different shots need different models. A slow process shot and a fast camera move fail in different ways, and the cheapest model that can carry a shot is often not the best-known one.
Choosing per shot is the part that keeps quality up and spend down. It is also the part that changes every few weeks, which is why it belongs in a workflow rather than in your head.
Send one topic, script, article or existing video. We will review it and come back to you before creating anything.
AI generates the visuals. You control the science.
No. You supply the science and the sources; the production side is handled for you.
Yes. A published video, a paper, a script or a rough topic all work as a starting point.
You supply the sources and review the intermediate visuals, and nothing is generated further until a correction is applied. Accuracy rests on your review, not on the model.
No. The first sample is free. If the topic is suitable, we contact you before creating anything.
Each sample is reviewed and produced with founder involvement, so the topic is assessed before production starts.
It depends on the references and on who reviews the representation. Some subjects need an expert we do not have, and in that case we say so rather than guess.